The seed company have tons of seeds, but they only release a few at a time. The scarcity will cause the individual growers to pay more than they want to if they really want to grow that strain. But the seed company will only release 10 ten packs in an auction, and there are 100 growers trying to buy them. Imagine you wanted to buy a ten pack of seeds of the latest most popular strain. So I will explain it where they can understand it. It seems some of our MAGA members doesn't know how supply and demand works. But a guru like you already knew that, didn't he?
Inflation when coming out of the pandemic was predicted years ago. This surge in inflation is entirely due to Trump's mishandling of the epidemic AND "free market" multinational corporate bullshit. Now that Biden has adroitly and almost perfectly managed the end days of the epidemic, companies are hiring, employment is getting back to normal and - bonus - wages are finally going up too. It failed and while it is recovering, supply shortages and downsized workforces are causing shortages, rising salaries and rising cost.
The capitalist globalist economy with it's interconnected just in time supply system is inherently weak and it broke. Last year, the epidemic that Trump failed to adequately respond to broke employment and supply chains. I mean, until last year, inflation was running around 2%, which it had been for more than a decade. Tell us more about how inflation is ruining you. The truly funny thing is, even if you make more than I do, which I doubt, it doesn't validate anything you say. But our best chance of getting as close as possible to this ideal - our best chance of closing enough of the pathways so that those that remain open are not collectively large enough to endanger the entire financial structure and the broader economy - is to impose broad based, comprehensive regulation that prevents excessive accumulations of risk and fixes other market failures.Click to expand.^^This person who thinks Nazis were communists is lecturing about capitalism. We will never close every hole or anticipate every possible way that the system might be exploited and made vulnerable. The regulatory structure designed in the 1930s seemed to solve this problem for 60 years, but something else will be needed for the next 60.Īnd that "something else" must, for one thing, close the pathways that allow financial firms to bypass regulatory scrutiny, or as many as it can anyway. But if everyone does, the regulations will no longer protect anyone. Some consumers and firms will find this attractive and switch their deposits. If such an equilibrium could be reached, it would still be possible for an institution outside this regulated system to offer deposits that are only slightly more risky but that also pay a higher return than deposits at the regulated banks.
SHADOW PRESIDENT WINDOWS 7 FREE
The regulatory problem that needs to be solved is roughly this: The public needs a conveniently provided medium of exchange that is free of default risk or "bank runs." The best way to achieve this would be to have a competitive banking system with government-insured deposits.īut this can only work if the assets held by these banks are tightly regulated. Nobel Laureate Robert Lucas explains one reason why this is necessary: On the latter point, the subject of this discussion, I believe we need to extend the regulatory umbrella broadly and bring the non-traditional banking sector under the same regulatory authority as The question is what we should do now to fix the damage that has been done, and to ensure it doesn't happen again. Unfortunately, when the mortgage finance bubble popped this vulnerability was realized, and we find ourselves where we are today. This shadow or non-traditional banking sector grew rapidly, and the vulnerability of the financial system to collapse grew along with the growth in the unregulated sector.